Sunday, August 23, 2009

Last House On The Left (2009) 114 Minutes, Unrated Cut. Dennis Iliadis, Director.

As I posted on twitter the day before this film released on DVD here in the USA, I had only one wish for this movie. I wished that it not make me angry. I am a big fan of Wes Craven's original film and, when hearing that it was going to be remade, I was not a happy camper. Why not? Well, I'm not a big fan of remakes. I don't mind them, in theory. It comes down to what's done with that material. Some remakes improve on the material (The Thing), some do interesting spins on the material (Dawn of the Dead '04), some are mediocre (Texas Chainsaw Massacre), and some are absolute travesties (I Am Legend.) I always worry about having a travesty befall a story that I love. While admittedly not a huge fan of Friday The 13th, on the whole, I was completely incensed with how poorly that “re-boot” was handled. This is also the reason that I didn't go to the theater to see this film, and waited for DVD. The one thing that made me feel a little bit more comfortable about this remake being made was that Craven was directly involved with it and hand picked the director for it. I don't always like Craven's work, but I trusted him to understand how important the original film was to its fans.

It was not without a sense of dread, and I assure you that it wasn't the kind of dread that the filmmakers were hoping I'd have, that I put the DVD in my player. All I wanted was to not hate this film. I would have been totally fine with it being mediocre, just did not want it to suck. Luckily, I got my wish.

For the uninitiated, Last House On The Left is a remake of a semi-notorious 1972 film of the same name. It was the first film written and directed by Wes Craven, which was loosely based on Ingmar Bergman's The Virgin Spring. While it's not without it's flaws, it was a disturbing and deeply affecting film.

Both versions of Last House On The Left tell the story of a teenage girl named Mari and her friend encountering escaped convict Krug and his gang. The gang kidnaps the two girls and assault them in the woods. Then when circumstances leave the gang stranded in the woods, they seek refuge in a nearby home that just happens to belong to the Mari's parents. The parents eventually figure out what happened and seek revenge for their daughter.

Strangely enough, this film is bookended by the two weakest scenes of the entire film. The opening five minutes should have been trimmed off, in my opinion. It's too predictable and unnecessary. There is no information there that we couldn't have figured out for ourselves from a single line or two of dialog that occurs about fifteen minutes later. And the last two and a half minutes of the film require a suspension of belief that is far beyond anything else that occurs in the film. Again unnecessary and honestly, just plain silly.

Those two things aside, this is a surprisingly solid remake. It is appropriately violent, bloody, and disturbing. The key change that most concerned me from the original (that one of the girls survives) is not as troublesome to the story as I'd been worried it would be. Several things are improved upon from the original version. One of the biggest improvements is the character development and the quality of the acting. All of the characters seem to be more fleshed out, more realistic.

The most obvious example of the improved acting is that of the parents. In the first film, they were easily the weakest link of the first film. (That is assuming that you take out the intentionally bumbling policemen, who were added to lighten the mood of the material. Thankfully, the remake removes that bit of nonsense.) In this version the parents act more like real people and less like soap opera archetypes. The original has a really annoying scene of the parents baking a cake for their daughter's birthday with them reading the recipe book together and so on that is completely ridiculous. For one, I've never had anyone read a recipe book with me, have you? But, I digress. In this version, they seem like more complete people, with the father wanting to get alone time with the mother although never actually saying so, the mother dealing with people from her job that she doesn't care for but has to feign politeness with(something I relate to more than I like to think about), and so on. They have lost a child already in this version, and that adds toward the reasons that they are willing to go to the lengths that they do for their daughter. And when they go to those lengths, it's very satisfying.

While it's an important part of the film, the rape scene is uncomfortable to watch, and if you are deeply affected by that kind of thing in a film, I'd advise you not watch this one. The scene is very graphic, but not in any kind of an arousing way. I feel like the scene is very much about power, punishment, and subjugation and not at all about sex or sexuality. At least that's the impression that I take from it. Surprisingly, unless you count Dillahunt's ass, this a nudity free scene. It's one of the most viscous rape scenes I've seen in recent cinema. Not on the level of Irreversible, mind you, but brutal to watch. It also shines a real spotlight on the sound design in the remake, as there are some very uncomfortable sounds at this point in the film. It certainly adds to the level of realism in the film.

The gang in the remake is still comprised of people who are sadistic killers, but they don't have the level of insanity that I felt from the gang in the original film. I don't mean to say that they do not work in the film or that they are a detriment to it, it's simply that the original casts a shadow over this one for me. In some ways this is one of the things about the remake that would work for me a lot more if I had never seen the original film.

Garret Dillahunt gave a great performance as Krug. I was familiar with him from having seen his work in Deadwood, The Assassination of Jesse James by the coward Robert Ford, and No Country For Old Men. He will also be in the upcoming film, The Road, which I'm very excited to see. His version of Krug is more calculated and measured character than David Hess' out of control psychopath. While there is nothing at all wrong with Dillahunt's performance or casting, for myself at least, David Hess is Krug. He is a lot of what made the original what it was.

I feel I need to mention the performance by Riki Lindhome. At first glance I thought she was cast for the simple reason that she was pretty enough and capable of looking mean. She looks like what I suspect some Hollywood executive would think a bad guy's girlfriend would look like. I have to chalk that up to my own personal cynicism though, because after watching the remake twice now, I have to say that she's my favorite character of the film. Lindhome brings the Sadie character to life far more than in the original film. She is desperate for Krug's approval, and while she is as deeply involved in the gang's deeds as anyone, there are moments where you get the feeling that she doesn't want things to be the way that they are. When her character is cornered later in the film and forced to fight, she is like a caged wild animal, positively feral. At that point in the film, she completely sold me on her performance.

I honestly can't say that I disliked the performances of anyone in this film. My only real complaints with it were the two scenes I mentioned earlier. That being said, I feel like this remake is pretty solid and totally worth watching. I would complain that it didn't really bring anything new to the story, but in the case of a story that I enjoy so much, I think it would have the potential to really upset me if it had. I think that for audiences today who are unwilling to watch older cinema (and shame on you if you are one of those) this is a great film.

For myself, I prefer the grainy look and feel of the original. Something about how it was shot, and certainly David Hess's Krug, make it a more visceral and frightening film to me. This film is more polished and clean looking, even if it is covering some gritty material. Still, it didn't upset me, and I'm very pleased about that part.

As for the DVD itself, it's pretty a pretty bare bones release. A couple of deleted scenes and a three minute long "Inside Look" featurette. I would have really liked a commentary track or two.

Comments are welcome.


  1. To put in some screenshots, just host them on photobucket, and link them back here. It puts an image at the top, but in edit mode, just click on the HTML tab and cut/paste the new code to where you want it in your text.

    the code usually starts with an a href and ends with a /a

    what i usually do inside that code is delete the part that sets the height of the image, and set the width to whatever you want

  2. I pretty much agree with everything you said. They can remake this movie a thousand times and Hess will always be Krug. I didn't notice anything spectacular about Lindhome, so I'll have to watch it again to see what you're talking about. I was too busy looking at her rack. I actually re-watched the original right before seeing the remake and I'm kinda in the middle when it comes to both. They were both good for different reasons and I think that this remake was deifnitely justifiable. And I might be one of the only people who actually LIKES the microwave scene. Yeah it's silly and doesn't fit with the mood of the rest of the film (it's also a bizarre choice for a pay-off), but I just really dig the way that it ends the movie and cuts right to the Death In Vegas song "Dirge" and the credits start rolling. I really dig sudden endings like that if they're done right. Anyway, great first post, man! Can't wait to see more.

  3. Yeah, or you can edit your pic in a program. I don't like it when blogs put up lots of huge pictures. It distracts from what is being said. Not too many pictures. Maybe if the trailer can be found on youtube, it can be imbedded in the blog. *shrug*

    I think that the acting overall was much better. I hated the Sadie character in the first movie. I thought she was like a characature of a real person, like most of them were, well maybe even all but Mari. While the first Krug was terrifying, I think that as a whole, society today knows a lot more about mental illness and someone who is so comic-bookishly "crazy" is not as believable as someone who is just calculating, smart, and unfeeling.

    In the 70's we had already had people like Manson, who seemed like a characacture himself, and that was the public's normal idea of what a crazy person was. It wasn't the reality. This Krug is terrifying in a very real way (the one in the remake).

  4. I have heard pretty decent things about the remake, and though I haven't seen the film yet, but I do know about the microwave ending. Completely unrealistic, but I kinda think it's cool that a modern film would do something that you would only expect to see in a cheap sleazy film from the 80's.

    Awesome write up, and one hell of a start to a new blog!

  5. Heavenztrash: Good first post and way to get off on the right foot. I think with this film, the original was like unexpected lightening: It can never strike twice with the same impact. I watched this film at the drive in when it was first released with a bunch of buddies and beer. I'll never, ever forget it; and to this day I can feel the sick, wonderful knot of tension I felt in my gut that night.

    You make the remake sound like a decent follow-up, but I'll pass. Some memories should stand alone. -- Mykal

  6. I can't say I blame you for taking a pass, Mykal. I seriously considered it myself. But ultimately I succumbed to my curiosity and checked it out. Thankfully, I haven't found myself feeling the need to rant endlessly about the evils of remakes afterward. (Which is exactly what happened with the Friday The 13th "reboot.") I really envy you getting to see the original on a big screen. I hadn't been born for another three years after it's original release. Thanks for the kind words!

  7. Good review! Definitely agree with you. This was a solid remake. A million times better than the Friday The 13th or Nightmare on Elm Street remakes. Those were terrible.